How Much Money Should You Raise?

I’ve been on calls and video shoots with three new projects we’ll be posting in January. One of the questions that comes up is how much money to ask for. We usually recommend a couple of things to think about:

  • Our sweet spot is a range between $3000 and $15000
  • Generally we recommend asking for the lesser amount- it is entirely possible to raise more than you ask for
  • Decide how you are going to use the money and be specific: A prototype, more research, an early production run, a next generation version, etc.
  • You can explain how you’d spend additional money if you get it: With $3000 we can take our current version and upgrade it to use cheaper parts. If we raise $6000 we’ll do that and build a test production run of twenty gizmos made for testing.
  • It’s easier to raise money if you show the potential supporter that their contribution is going to result in measurable progress towards a usable product, service or device, etc.

These days the ability to make things at lower cost is a reality. Innovations like rapid prototyping, 3D printers, agile software development, minimal viable product, cloud access to tools and other often free resources mean you can change the world for a few dollars.

To see how far this can go, read about an entrepreneur that is funding six startups with $37.00 dollars each (that is not a typo). The 37 bucks gets you six months of server rental and a hot beverage. He has had hundreds of applications for the program!

What is a ‘legitimate’ crowdfunding site?

Crowdfunding is an exploding sector with new sites appearing almost daily. In part this is driven by the success of seminal funding sites like Kickstarter and IndieGoGo. The recently passed JOBS Act with its loosening of the rules for raising equity funding (subject to yet to be determined SEC guidelines) has also opened the floodgates. However crowdfunding is about money and that attracts its share of less than legitimate players.

So how do you determine if a site is legitimate if you are thinking of posting a project or donating? As observers and active participants in the social funding world, particularly as it applies to universities, we have some internal guidelines for determining whether a site is the real thing:

  • Ownership. Is it clear who owns the site, why they started it and what their reasons are for starting it? A business, a charity, a not-for-profit? These things should be clearly stated on the site.
  • Funding restrictions. Funding restrictions include amounts to be raised, type of projects, time deadlines and curation of projects by the site managers. Funding restrictions are actually a good sign as they indicate the site’s primary purpose.
  • Revenue share and financial information. How much of the money goes to the project owner? What other fees are there and are they clearly stated upfront (not hidden in the fine print)? Legitimate sites clearly state how they are compensated.
  • Credit card processing. Is it secure? Do they clearly state their policies on the use of your information? How much of your donation goes to processing and other fees?
  • Do they claim to raise equity for businesses? This is legally complex territory. If they cite the JOBS Act and claim to raise equity be careful- this provision is not yet approved by the SEC and signs are that it will not be until 2013 at the earliest. Check with your attorney before raising equity or investing via a crowdfunding site.
  • If they claim association with a University or other organization, that association should be clearly spelled out. Universities have rules and regulations associated with raising money for projects developed under their auspices. Make sure your university approves the site being used before you post a project or donate.
  • Communication. Does the site have a mechanism for keeping donors up to date on the status of projects they have contributed to?
  • Use of Funds. How can you be sure your money is actually used for the project you donated to? In our case the funds are administered by the university members.

Crowd or social funding is a unique way to support entrepreneurship, research, new businesses, artists and creators. Its potential is virtually unlimited, however it is important to do a little research before you choose a platform for your project or donation.

Innovocracy Announces Academic Crowdfunding Project for an App for the Visually Impaired

VizWiz App Builds on a University of Rochester Prototype Already Used by 5,000 People to Answer 50,000 Questions

  • Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+Share on LinkedInEmail a friend

Rochester, NY (PRWEB) August 10, 2012

Contact: Martin Edic, 585-727-3119

Earlier this year, the University of Rochester Human Computer Interaction Group developed an initial iOS application called VizWiz, that blind people can use to answer visual questions in their everyday lives. Users simply take a picture and speak a question they’d like to know about it, and their questions are answered by people out on the web, usually in under a minute and all for free.

Thus far, answers have been provided primarily by workers on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk, a paid microtasking marketplace. In order to broaden the availability of the service to a larger portion of the visually impaired community, the project is now seeking crowdfunding through the Innovocracy platform.

“We would like to create a web site to serve as a hub and answering center for VizWiz volunteers. The site will allow users to sign up to answer questions, track worker quality (and perhaps give rewards to the best ones), and, most importantly, allow VizWiz to remain free to users,” says Jeff Bigham, Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science at the University of Rochester. He adds, “Building a volunteer workforce may eventually allow for more ambitious VizWiz services, such as a streaming video option”.

New supporters can make donations through the VizWiz project page on Innovocracy (http://innovocracy.org/vizwiz-support-network) as well as download the current version of the application on the Apple App Store (http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/vizwiz/id439686043).

About the Innovator
In 2009, Jeff appeared on the MIT Technology Review Top 35 Innovators Under 35 for his work on Web-Anywhere, a free screen reader that can be used with practically any web browser on any operating system. He is also the recipient of the NSF CAREER Award which is the National Science Foundation’s most prestigious awards in support of junior faculty who exemplify the role of teacher-scholars. Jeff is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Computer Science at the University of Rochester where he heads the Rochester Human Computer Interaction Group (ROC HCI). His work is at the intersection of human-computer interaction, human computation, and artificial intelligence, with a focus on developing innovative technology that serves people with disabilities in their everyday lives.

About Innovocracy.org
Innovocracy, a benefit corporation based in New York State, is a social funding platform created to rapidly commercialize innovation coming out of academic research. Innovocracy is building a network of leading research universities, as well as of individuals with an interest in sponsoring commercializable research, in order to efficiently identify and fund critical proof-of-concept activities and take the first steps toward building companies around university-based innovations. Most of the products and services supported by Innovocracy create social benefit for society, such as those related to healthcare, sustainability, education and extreme affordability. Innovocracy’s social funding site at http://www.innovocracy.org helps inventors raise money from donors with a personal or professional interest in the social benefits of those inventions. All the funds raised, except third-party credit card fees, go directly to the innovator while conforming to the unique requirements of each member university. In addition, Innovocracy offers to work with select innovators to facilitate the creation of startups to commercialize their research. Learn more at Innovocracy.org.

Link to this on PRWeb: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2012/8/prweb9783501.htm

Basing a Crowdfunding Start-up on an Assumption

Today Pando Daily, a tech news blog, has written that it appears that the SEC will not will not complete a regulatory framework for the JOBS Act until 2014 at the earliest. This Act, among other things, clears the way for crowdfunding to be used by companies to raise equity from individual investors who are not accredited, up to a million dollars. However it is subject to SEC review which was expected in early 2013.

(Note: I’m taking this with a grain of salt until I see it confirmed by a more reliable news source)

Though Innovocracy is not built on the assumption that this would take place (we’re really about commercialization of products in academia, typically prior to company formation), we are seeing many crowdfunding start-ups appearing whose business plans are based on SEC review of the Act. A big delay like this would likely be catastrophic for them as a two year or more delay in the early life of a start-up is an eternity.

My observation here is that crowdfunding is only a means. The end game is the value we offer to Innovators, our university partners and those who monetarily support our Projects. In our case this includes membership in an expanding network created to streamline funding while ensuring that the funds go to the Innovator efficiently and that the universities retain benefit from that Innovation. We are also increasingly seeing Innovocracy as a platform for helping successful Projects move on to the next step, whether that is business formation or partnerships for commercialization. Perhaps most important, we focus on Innovation that materially improves lives whether it is medical devices, energy efficiency projects or technology easily utilized in impoverished areas, among other things.

Would we utilize Innovocracy as an equity-raising site, given SEC finalization? It’s possible but that is not integral to our business model.

Crowdfunding lessons from the story of a bullied bus monitor

Given that Innovocracy is headquartered in Rochester (NY), I watched with particular interest as a local story involving crowdfunding became an international sensation over the past week.  By now most of us are familiar with Karen Klein, a 68-year-old bus monitor who was mercilessly taunted by a group of middle schoolers on the last day of school.  One of the kids filmed the encounter and soon the appalling video had gone viral.  The video caused swift outrage, as well as an outpouring of sympathy and admiration for Klein.

A complete stranger in Canada by the name of Max Siderov decided to set up a crowdfunding campaign on Indiegogo.com to raise $5,000 so that Klein could go on a well-deserved vacation.  Within days hundreds of thousands of dollars in donations had come in, and by yesterday the total got up to a startling $661,000.

This story is of course about a lot more than crowdfunding, but that element of it is also remarkable and telling.  In particular, there seem to be at least three lessons relative to crowdfunding, and these would be worthwhile to keep in mind for those considering the submission of their projects to Innovocracy.

First, Klein’s story provides further confirmation, among many other indicators, that the breadth and magnitude of crowdfunding is expanding rapidly.  What began as a way to fund creative projects is now finding ever-wider applications in the realms of charity, social action, entrepreneurship and innovation.  Further, as more and more people utilize crowdfunding, the network effect will continue to grow, perhaps exponentially.  Over time it is likely that crowdfunding activity will be a central way in which many people will publicly and privately express who they are and what they care about.  This will greatly empower those individual contributors, and provide an unparalleled opportunity to those who can convince others of the merit of their ideas.

Second, while what happened to Klein was terrible, it was actually seeing what happened to Klein that really caused this news story and the resulting crowdfunding campaign to grow so large.  Of course few videos can achieve the raw emotional impact that the Karen Klein video has, but a well-presented video can make a huge impact on a crowdfunding campaign.  While there have been a number of articles recently arguing that every person should learn how to program a computer, an argument could be made that most people, and especially those seeking crowdfunding dollars, could also greatly benefit by learning to create well thought-out and poignant videos.  While the written description of your project is important, it will often be that video that really ends up swaying the decision, so effort on getting it done well is time well spent.

Third, Klein’s story also reinforces that what most often moves people to take action is a genuine emotional connection to the cause or goal behind the project.  Many of us really appreciate great science or new ideas, but we are passionate at a whole other level when it comes to doing something significant about the problems we most care about.  This is why we at Innovocracy continue to believe that projects in areas like healthcare, sustainability, poverty alleviation (via, for instance, extreme affordability) and early education are the kinds that will do best on our platform.  Further, this also means that the key to successfully using the Innovocracy platform will not only lie in explaining why your innovation is scientifically superior but in being able to clearly and compellingly explain why your project can make a dent in creating a better world.

From the way you express the problem you are trying to solve, to the video and text you use to describe your solution, you must remember that it is passion and not just science that will more often enable you to achieve your crowdfunding goal.

Crowdfunding News: June 18-24

Crowdfunding is a super hot topic right now so we’re going to highlight a few news items each week that we’ve found interesting. Because things are evolving almost daily with new concepts and sites appearing and pundits weighing in, this weekly column is not ‘state of the art’, it is closer to social anthropology, i.e. we’re engaged observers and participants watching an emerging phenomena:

Weighing In On The JOBS Act:

Here’s a pretty fishy take on using crowdfunding to fool NASDAQ into thinking you have a large enough shareholder base to be listed.

 Innovocracy News:

Light news this week as summer begins!

General Crowdfunding News:

A seemingly frivolous lawsuit has The Oatmeal creator raising defense funds on IndieGoGo (over $180,000) who, in turn get sued by the lawyer who brought the suit on tax questions. Confused yet? Going to see more stuff about the sales tax and deductability issues as this progresses, I’m sure.

 News For Project Owners

Marketing guru Seth Godin shares insights on why Kickstarter projects fail and succeed: Their tribes are not big enough. While Innovocracy is quite different, this advice is directly applicable to your Project.

 

Crowdfunding News: June 11-17, 2012

Crowdfunding is a super hot topic right now so we’re going to highlight a few news items each week that we’ve found interesting. Because things are evolving almost daily with new concepts and sites appearing and pundits weighing in, this weekly column is not ‘state of the art’, it is closer to social anthropology, i.e. we’re engaged observers and participants watching an emerging phenomena:

Weighing In On The JOBS Act:

The Economist takes a look at equity crowdfunding- a view from across the pond.

 Innovocracy News:

MonoMano, an Innovocracy-funded company, demonstrates their single handed control device enabling those with the use of only one arm to ride a recumbent bike.

General Crowdfunding News:

Crowdfunding or CommunityFunding, a white paper from yet another site trying to differentiate their model from the crowd. However, the community concept is pretty important- we tap into large communities centered around universities including students, alumni, parents, faculty and administration.

Clayton Christensen, author of The Innovator’s Dilemma on why he invested in crowdfunding site CircleUp. Their focus is equity investing in consumer and retail startups.

 News For Project Owners

Sir James Dyson on why failure is a desirable trait.

 

Clayton Christensen on Crowdfunding

“I would say that for now the areas where it has the most opportunity to disrupt is by taking root in these underserved areas that traditional financiers have traditionally found unattractive.  This is a classic entry point for disruption – expand participation in the market by lowering cost at the low end of the market, where incumbents don’t see profit opportunities. Later, as the platforms gain scale, then they may start to add scope, or may start to add later-stage funding opportunities.  That’s likely where all of this goes next.”

- Clayton Christensen (The Innovator’s Dilemma and others) from an interview in CNNMoney

Crowdfunding News: May 29- June 3

Crowdfunding is a super hot topic right now so we’re going to highlight a few news items each week that we’ve found interesting. Because things are evolving almost daily with new concepts and sites appearing and pundits weighing in, this weekly column is not ‘state of the art’, it is closer to social anthropology, i.e. we’re engaged observers and participants watching an emerging phenomena:

Weighing In On The JOBS Act:

The JOBS (Jumpstart Our Business Startups) Act has yet to be approved by the SEC. Here’s some things they might want to consider during that process.

Innovocracy News:

Why crowdfunding in a university environment is not like Kickstarter (hint- it’s probably not a great idea to raise crowdfunding that way if your research is done within a lab funded by grants and other funding sourced by the university)

General Crowdfunding News:

Wow, we already have a bible- called The Crowdfunding Bible (d’oh!). Haven’t read it yet but there’s a free download so I’m planning on it.

Good basic intro to crowdfunding on the SBA site.

 New Crowdfunding Models:

Petridish.org started it, now we’re seeing more research crowdfunding sites emerging. Innovocracy differs in that we work through the universities and fund projects with commercialization plans.

Other Stuff:

Fast Company wonders if crowdfunders won’t just take the money and spend it on trips to Cabo and coke…(silly question we think!)